Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/18/2009 Of Shantilal M. Jain v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax , Central Circle -24, Mumbai
Date of order
21 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
In Itxa/18/2009 Of Shantilal M. Jain v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax , Central Circle -24, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: By a separate order we have set aside the order and restored the matter back to the file of A.O. including permission to the assessee to lead additional evidence.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.18 OF 2009
Shantilal M.Jain )..Appellant
V/s.
Asst.Commissioner of Income-tax )
Central Circle-24, Mumbai )..Respondents
----
Mr.Atul K.Jasani for the appellant.
Mr.Y.P.Patki with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the
respondents.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 21.01.2009.
PC
1. The questions as framed here were also an issue
in Income-tax Appel No.1268 of 2008 and other
appeals which were disposed off on 19.1.2009. By a
separate order we have set aside the order and
restored the matter back to the file of A.O.
including permission to the assessee to lead
additional evidence.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue