Case Law › High Court › Itxa/183/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/183/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-Ii v. Pratima H. Mehta

High Court 22 Aug 2005 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

22 Aug 2005

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/183/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-Ii v. Pratima H. Mehta, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.183 OF 2002 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Central-VII, Mumbai .. Appellant. V/s. Smt.Pratima H. Mehta .. Respondent. None present. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & CORAM : V.C. DAGA & CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND AUGUST, 2005. DATED : 22ND AUGUST, 2005. DATED : 22ND AUGUST, 2005. P.C. : 1. None for the appellant. 2. Dismissed for want of prosecution. (V.C. DAGA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.