In Itxa/183/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I Pune v. Haworth (India) Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.In the light of the above, the appeal being bereft of any substantial question of law, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 183 OF 2015
The Commissioner of Income Tax-Iv/s.
Haworth India Pvt. Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
Mr. Tejinder Singh for the appellant Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the respondent
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & A.M. BADAR, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 7[th] JULY, 2017
1.This appeal relates to Assessment Year 2005-06.
2.The learned Counsel for the appellant fairly concedes that the
question involved in the present appeal is covered by the judgment and order of this Court amongst the same parties for the earlier assessment year in Income Tax Appeal No.2435 of 2013 decided on 12[th] July, 2016.
3.In the light of the above, the appeal being bereft of any substantial question of law, the appeal is dismissed. No costs.
(A.M. BADAR, J.)
(S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue