Itxa/1832/2016 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Premier Finance And Trading Co.ltd
High Court
06 Mar 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1832/2016 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Premier Finance And Trading Co.ltd
Date of order
06 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1832/2016 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Premier Finance And Trading Co.ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Priya Soparkar
12 itxa 1832-16-o
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1832 OF 2016
Pr.Commissioner of Income-Tax
… Appellant
V/s.
Premier Finance & Trading Co. Ltd.… Respondent
---
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Mr.Jay Bhansali for the Respondent.
---
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 6, 2019.
P.C.:-
1.Revenue has filed this appeal against the judgment of theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal raising following question for our
consideration:-
“Whether on the facts and circumstances of thecase, the Tribunal is justified in dismissing therevenue's appeal against the CIT(A) decision indirecting the Assessing Officer to recompute thedisallowance u/s 14A of the I.T.Act, 1961 on aproportionate basis?”
Priya Soparkar
212 itxa 1832-16-o
assessment year 2004-05 and concerns the applicability ofSection 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” for short).Perusal of the impugned judgment of the Tribunal would showthat the Tribunal had in this respect upheld the order of the CIT(Appeals) directing the Assessing Officer to recompute thedisallowance on proportionate basis. Learned counsel for therevenue submitted that the CIT (Appeals) had placed the matterback before the Assessing Officer for recomputation ofdisallowance. That being the position, we do not find the errorin view of the Tribunal, not interfering the order of the CIT(Appeals). No question of law arises. Tax appeal is dismissed.
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.)….
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.