Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1854/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1854/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iv Mumbai v. Avalon Investment Pvt Ltd

High Court 27 Jul 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1854/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iv Mumbai v. Avalon Investment Pvt Ltd
Date of order
27 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1854/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iv Mumbai v. Avalon Investment Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: DEVADHAR AND A.A.SAYED, JJ.DATED : 27TH JULY, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in deleting the addition of Rs.30,00,000/- made as undisclosed income in the block assessment order passed under Section 158BD of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is the question raised in this appeal.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1854 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Mumbai..Appellant. V/s. Avalon Investment Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta i/b. Ms. Padma Divakar for the appellant.Ms. Beena Pillai for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A.SAYED, JJ.DATED : 27TH JULY, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in deleting the addition of Rs.30,00,000/- made as undisclosed income in the block assessment order passed under Section 158BD of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is the question raised in this appeal. 2.The ITAT in para 7 of its order has recorded finding of fact that in the present case a sum of Rs.30,00,000/- was reflected in the books of accounts maintained by the assessee and was also reflected in the regular return filed by the assessee. In such a case, the deletion of the addition in the block assessment cannot be faulted. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (A.A. SAYED, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan