In Itxa/1854/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iv Mumbai v. Avalon Investment Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: DEVADHAR AND A.A.SAYED, JJ.DATED : 27TH JULY, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in deleting the addition of Rs.30,00,000/- made as undisclosed income in the block assessment order passed under Section 158BD of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is the question raised in this appeal.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1854 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Mumbai..Appellant.
V/s.
Avalon Investment Pvt. Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta i/b. Ms. Padma Divakar for the appellant.Ms. Beena Pillai for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A.SAYED, JJ.DATED : 27TH JULY, 2011
P.C. :-
1.Whether the ITAT was justified in deleting the addition of Rs.30,00,000/- made as undisclosed income in the block assessment order passed under Section 158BD of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is the question raised in this appeal.
2.The ITAT in para 7 of its order has recorded finding of fact that in the present case a sum of Rs.30,00,000/- was reflected in the books of accounts maintained by the assessee and was also reflected in
the regular return filed by the assessee. In such a case, the deletion of the addition in the block assessment cannot be faulted. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.