Case Law › High Court › Itxa/1854/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itxa/1854/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-(E),Pune v. Maharashtra Academy Of Engineering And Educational Research

High Court 04 Apr 2022 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

04 Apr 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1854/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-(E),Pune v. Maharashtra Academy Of Engineering And Educational Research, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2965 OF 2018 Commissioner of Income Tax – (E), Pune ….Appellant V/s. Maharashtra Academy of Engineeringand Educational Research ….Respondent WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1294 OF 2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1393 OF 2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1856 OF 2018WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1865 OF 2018WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1854 OF 2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1883 OF 2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3059 OF 2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3001 OF 2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2 OF 2019 WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3164 OF 2018 ---- Mr. Sham Walve for appellant in all appeals. Mr. Riyaz Padvekar a/w. Mr. Mandar Vaidya for respondents inITXA/2965/2018, ITXA/1294/2018, ITXA/1393/2018, ITXA/1856/2018AND ITXA/1865/2018. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & N.R. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 4[th] APRIL 2022 P.C.: 1 Mr. Walve seeks leave of the Court to withdraw all the appeals since the tax effect is below the prescribed threshold. Gauri Gaekwad 2All appeals dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of Court fees, if any, in accordance with rules. (N.R. BORKAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.