Itxa/1865/2013 Of Atul Madhursinh Ramaiya v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-24
High Court
16 Mar 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1865/2013 Of Atul Madhursinh Ramaiya v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-24
Date of order
16 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/1865/2013 Of Atul Madhursinh Ramaiya v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-24, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
* 1/1 * ITXA-1865-2013 (SR. 903)
Friday, 16.3.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1865 OF 2013
Atul Madhursinh Ramaiya ….AppellantV/s.Commissioner of Income-Tax24….Respondent
* * * * *
Mr. Mayank Thosar i/by. Mr. B.V. Jhaveri, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Arvind Pinto, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE :-16TH MARCH, 2018.
P.C. :-
1.
Mr. Mayank Thosar, Learned Counsel
appearing in support of the Appeal, on instructions, seeks
to withdraw this Appeal. Appeal disposed of as
withdrawn.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue