Itxa/1865/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Mahindra Navistar Automotives Ltd
High Court
15 Nov 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1865/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Mahindra Navistar Automotives Ltd
Date of order
15 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1865/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Mahindra Navistar Automotives Ltd, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
MEERAMAHESHJADHAV
Digitallysigned byMEERAMAHESHJADHAVDate:2021.11.1514:52:32+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1865 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -2
….Appellant
V/s.Mahindra Navistar Automotives Ltd
…Respondent
----
Mr. Suresh Kumar for Appellant
Ms Hetal Laghave i/b Mr. Sanjiv M Shah for Respondent
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ
DATED : 15[th] NOVEMBER 2021
P.C. :
1Mr. Suresh Kumar states since the matter has been settled under the
Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act 2020, appeal be dismissed as withdrawn.
2Appeal dismissed as withdrawn .
3Refund of court fees, if any, in accordance with rules.
(AMIT B. BORKAR, J)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue