Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1872/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itxa/1872/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Thane v. M/S Cosmos Developers

High Court 08 Jun 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1872/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Thane v. M/S Cosmos Developers
Date of order
08 Jun 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/1872/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Thane v. M/S Cosmos Developers, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Decision: 3.The appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1872 OF 2014 Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Thanev/s. .. Appellant M/s. Cosmos Developers .. Respondent Mr. Ashok Kotangle a/w Ms. Padma Divakar for the appellant Mr. Sameer Dalal i/b Mr. Sudhakar Lakhani for the respondent CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & G.S. KULKARNI, J.J. P.C. DATED : 8[th] JUNE, 2017 1. The learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the tax effect involved in the present appeal is only Rs.7,69,133/- and as per the CBDT Circular No.21 of 2015 dated 10[th] December, 2015, the department has taken a policy decision not to prosecute the appeals wherein the tax effect is less than Rs.20 lakhs. 2.In view of the above, the learned Counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. 3.The appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. No costs. (G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan