In Itxa/1892/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central-Ii v. Hindustan Construction Company Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: For the reasons recorded in our order passed in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.276 of 2006, this appeal is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.275 OF 2006
Commissioner of Income-tax,
Central II, Mumbai - 20 ..Appellant
V/s.
Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. ..Respondent
Mr.Yogesh Patki with Mr.B.M. Chatterjee for the
Appellant.
Mr.S.M. Shah for the Respondent.
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 31ST JULY, 2008
P.C. :
1. The learned counsel for the appellant
states that the issue involved in this matter is
identical to the issue involved in Income Tax
Appeal (L) No.276 of 2006. Statement is accepted.
2. For the reasons recorded in our order
passed in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.276 of 2006,
this appeal is disposed of.
D.K. DESHMUKH, J.
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue