In Itxa/1901/2009 Of Rajkumar Sharma v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Xvii Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1901 OF 2009
Rajkumar Sharma.
... Appellant.
V/s.
The Commissioner of Income-tax.
... Respondent.
Ms.Asifa Khan for the appellant.
D.K.Kamwal for the respondent.
P.C.:
CORAM :V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 8[th] October 2009.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent. Perused appeal.
2.We were taken through the impugned order. The findings of fact are recorded by the Tribunal based on appreciation of evidence on record which is clear from the impugned order. We see no substantial question of law involved in this appeal warranting admission of appeal. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue