Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/190/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/190/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 Mumbai v. M/S. Suraj Diamonds (1) Ltd

High Court 15 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/190/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 Mumbai v. M/S. Suraj Diamonds (1) Ltd
Date of order
15 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/190/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 Mumbai v. M/S. Suraj Diamonds (1) Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In this view of the matter, appeal is dismissed in limini.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.190 OF 2009 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.190 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Suraj Diamonds (I) Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant. Mr.Atul Jasani for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 15TH APRIL, 2009. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 15TH APRIL, 2009. P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent. The appeal raises the following questions of law:- 1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is right in confirming the CIT(A)’s order in directing the A.O. to include the proceeds of sale of scrap and labour charges received by the assessee co. in the profit of business for the purpose of computation of deduction u/s.80HHC of the I.T Act, 1961 2) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is right in conforming the CIT(A)’s order holding that 10% of the export incentive will not form part of the indirect cost allocable to trading export ? 2. Taking the second question first, the said question is covered by the Judgment of the Supreme - = : 2 : = - Hero Exports V/s. Commissionerof Income-tax reported in [2007] 295 I.T.R. 454 Court in the case of Hero Exports V/s. Commissioner of Income-tax (S.C.). In this view of the matter, the appeal with (S.C.). (S.C.). regard to the second question stands answered accordingly. 3. So far as the first question is concerned, in the case of the assessee itself, the question relating to exclusion of the labour charges was not pressed by the revenue in Income Tax Appeal No.1228 of 2007, evident from the order dated 4/8/2008 (copy retained on record). Hence, we do not see any question of law involved in the appeal. 4. So far as the sale of scrap is concerned, it has hardly any tax impact. In this view of the matter, appeal is dismissed in limini. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan