Itxa/191/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 6 ,Mumbai v. M/S Laxmi Ventures (India) Ltd. ,Mumbai
High Court
07 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/191/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 6 ,Mumbai v. M/S Laxmi Ventures (India) Ltd. ,Mumbai
Date of order
07 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/191/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 6 ,Mumbai v. M/S Laxmi Ventures (India) Ltd. ,Mumbai, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Rane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 191 OF 2009
ALONGWITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 3533 OF 2009
The Commissioner ofIncome Tax-6, Mumbai….AppellantV/s.M/s. Laxmi Ventures (India) Ltd. Mumbai….Respondent
* * * *
None for the appellant.
Mr. V.S. Hadade, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA, &SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.
TUESDAY, 7TH AUGUST, 2018.
P.C. :1. None appeared in support of the Appealswhen they were first called out. They were kept back.
On being called the second time, again none appears insupport of the Appeals.
Rane
2/2
ITXA—191-2009
ITXA-3533-2009(SR.51)7.8.2018
2. It appears, the appellant is not desirous of
prosecuting these Appeals. This particularly in view ofthe fact that Advocate and parties were put to notice on27[th] July, 2018 that these Appeals would be taken upfor consideration today. Appeals dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.