Case Law › High Court › Itxa/192/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/192/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central-Ii,Mum v. M/S Zest Holsings P. Ltd

High Court 31 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

31 Jul 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Itxa/192/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central-Ii,Mum v. M/S Zest Holsings P. Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.192 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Central II, Bombay ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Zest Holdings Pvt. Ltd., ..Respondent. Mr.B.M. Chatterjee for the Appellant. Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 31ST JULY, 2008 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel both the sides. 2. So far as question of law c and d are concerned, it is fairly stated that they are covered by order dated 12-03-2008 passed in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.2214 of 2006. 3. So far as question of law a and b are concerned, it is common ground that the appellant is a party notified under Special Court (Trial of Offences relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 and, therefore, no fault can be found with the order of the tribunal. 4. There is no substance in the appeal. Hence, rejected. J.P. DEVADHAR, J. D.K. DESHMUKH, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.