In Itxa/1955/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 8 ,Mumbai v. M/S Aramex India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1955 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax.
... Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Aramex India Pvt.Ltd.... Respondent.
Ms.Suchitra Kamble for the appellant.
K.Gopal with Jitendra Singh for the respondent.
P.C.:
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent. Perused appeal.
2.The question sought to be raised in this appeal is already considered by this Court in ITXA No.234/2009 in the case of assessee itself. In this view of the matter, we see no substantial question of law involved in this appeal. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue