Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1957/2009 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1957/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 14, Mumbai v. M/S Tribhuvandas Bhimji Zaveri

High Court 17 Nov 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1957/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 14, Mumbai v. M/S Tribhuvandas Bhimji Zaveri
Date of order
17 Nov 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/1957/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 14, Mumbai v. M/S Tribhuvandas Bhimji Zaveri, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The question sought to be raised in this appeal is whether the tribunal was right in confirming the decision of CIT(A) on foreign travel expenses and allowing the assessee's claim for deduction u/s.80IB of Income Tax Act.

Decision: The appeals are, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL N O.910 OF 2009ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1957 OF 2009AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2220 OF 2009 The Commissioner Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Tribhovandas Bhimji Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for appellant. Dr. K. Shivram with Paras Savla and Rangesh Banker for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 17TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C. :- Heard learned counsel for the revenue and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent. The question sought to be raised in this appeal is whether the tribunal was right in confirming the decision of CIT(A) on foreign travel expenses and allowing the assessee's claim for deduction u/s.80IB of Income Tax Act. We were taken through the order of the Tribunal wherein in paragraphs 6 & 7 of the impugned order, the Tribunal has dealt with the deduction under section 80IB of the Act. Having gone through the same, we find no fault with the view taken by the Tribunal. The view taken by the Tribunal is reasonable and possible view. No substantial question of law arise in the appeals. The appeals are, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan