In Itxa/1957/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax V Pune v. Daimler Chrysler India Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.713 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-V, Pune
..Appellant.
V/s.
Daimler Chrysler India Pvt. Ltd.(Now Mercedez Benz India Pvt. Ltd.)
..Respondent.
Mr. N.N. Singh for the appellant.
Mr. Ajit Shah with Shrihari Iyer for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND K.K. TATED, JJ.
DATED : 16TH AUGUST, 2011
P.C. :-
This appeal is filed by the revenue against the order of the ITAT dismissing the Miscellaneous Application filed by the revenue. The said Miscellaneous Application was dismissed by the ITAT with liberty to the revenue to move an application for restoration of the Miscellaneous Application. In these circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain this appeal. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(K.K. TATED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue