Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1964/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itxa/1964/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Ii v. M/S. Supreme Petrochem Ltd

High Court 04 Mar 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1964/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Ii v. M/S. Supreme Petrochem Ltd
Date of order
04 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/1964/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Ii v. M/S. Supreme Petrochem Ltd, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Issue: (ii)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the interpretation taken by the Tribunal while making the deletion is in conformity with law and the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of JCIT V/s.

Decision: 5.The appeal is accordingly disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1964 OF 2011 Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-II, Mumbai ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Supreme Petrochem Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Padma Divakar for the appellant. Mr. B.D. Damodar i/b. Kanga & Co. for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. DATED : 4TH MARCH, 2013 P.C. :- 1.In this appeal by the revenue for the assessment year 2006-07, following questions of law has been raised for our consideration:- (i)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law, in holding that interest u/s.234B is not chargeable for non payment of advance tax in respect of income computed u/s.115-JB of the I.T. Act, 1961 ?Tribunal was right in law, in holding that interest u/s.234B is not chargeable for non payment of advance tax in respect of income computed u/s.115-JB of the I.T. Act, 1961 ? (ii)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the interpretation taken by the Tribunal while making the deletion is in conformity with law and the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of JCIT V/s. Rolta India Ltd. (SC) Civil Appeal No.153/2011 ?interpretation taken by the Tribunal while making the deletion is in conformity with law and the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of JCIT V/s. Rolta India Ltd. (SC) Civil Appeal No.153/2011 ? 2.The appeal is admitted on the above questions. 3.By consent of the parties, the appeal is taken up for final hearing. 4.Counsel for the parties state that the issue now stands concluded in favour of the revenue and against the respondent-assessee by the decision of the Apex Court in the matter of JCIT V/s. Rolta India Ltd. reported in [2011] 330 ITR 470 (SC). In view of the above, issues arising in this appeal are answered in favour of the revenue and against the accused. 5.The appeal is accordingly disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan