Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1969/2010 Of Commissiner Of Income-...

Itxa/1969/2010 Of Commissiner Of Income-Tax-4,Mum v. Ricolene Syntex Pvt Ltd

High Court 31 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1969/2010 Of Commissiner Of Income-Tax-4,Mum v. Ricolene Syntex Pvt Ltd
Date of order
31 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1969/2010 Of Commissiner Of Income-Tax-4,Mum v. Ricolene Syntex Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view thereof, the Appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1526 OF 2007 The Chief Commissioner of Income TaxVs.Ricolene Syntex Pvt.Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mrs.P.P.Bhosale for the Appellant.Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATE : 31ST MARCH, 2008 P.C. .By consent, the Appeal is taken up forhearing. We have perused the order dated 27thFebruary,2008 passed by this Court, in Income TaxAppeal No.1393 of 2000. The learned Counsel for theparties categorically state that the issued involvedin the present Appeal is squarely covered by the saidorder dated 27th February, 2008, against the Revenue. In view thereof, the Appeal stands dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan