Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/197/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itxa/197/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Tds-2 v. M/S. Rameshwar Developer

High Court 10 Jul 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/197/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Tds-2 v. M/S. Rameshwar Developer
Date of order
10 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/197/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Tds-2 v. M/S. Rameshwar Developer, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: BADAR, JJ.DATE:10[th] JULY 2017 P.C. : 1The issue is whether the lump-sum premium paid by the assessee to CIDCO would amount to rent and levy any tax under Section 194-I of the Act.

Decision: In view of that, the learned counsel for the appellant 4The appeal, as such, is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.197 OF 2015 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – TDS-2 )...APPELLANT V/s. M/S.RAMESHWAR DEVELOPER)...RESPONDENT Ms.Samiksha Kanani i/b. Mr.Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the Appellant. CORAM:S.V.GANGAPURWALA &A. M. BADAR, JJ.DATE:10[th] JULY 2017 P.C. : 1The issue is whether the lump-sum premium paid by the assessee to CIDCO would amount to rent and levy any tax under Section 194-I of the Act. 2The learned counsel for the appellant fairly concedes that the CBDT Circular No.35 of 2016 dated 13[th] October 2016 clarifies that a lump-sum premium / one time upfront lease charges paid for acquisition of long term leasehold rights over the avk 1/2 land or any other property would not be in the nature of rent within the meaning of Section 194-I of the Act. 3seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. In view of that, the learned counsel for the appellant 4The appeal, as such, is dismissed as withdrawn. Court fees as per rules be refunded. No costs. (A. M. BADAR, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA), J.) avk 2/2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan