In Itxa/2000/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Mumbai v. M/S. Guru Holdings P. Ltd. Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Following the order dated 15th September, 2009 passed in Income Tax Appeal No.1772 of 2009 dealing with the assessment year 1997-98, the present appeal is also dismissed for want of substantial question of law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2000 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Guru Holdings P. Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan i/b. Suresh Kumar for appellant.
Mr. Pankaj R. Toprani for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 9TH OCTOBER, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the rival parties. The impugned order is pertaining to assessment years 1997-98 and 1998-99. An identical question of law sought to be raised for the assessment year 1997-98 in Income Tax Appeal No.1772 of 2009 was held not arising from the order of the Tribunal. The same question is sought to be raised in the present appeal. Following the order dated 15th September, 2009 passed in Income Tax Appeal No.1772 of 2009 dealing with the assessment year 1997-98, the present appeal is also dismissed for want of substantial question of law. No order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue