Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/2038/2010 Of The Commissiner Of Inc...

Itxa/2038/2010 Of The Commissiner Of Income-Tax-2,Mum v. Bank Of Baroda

High Court 09 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2038/2010 Of The Commissiner Of Income-Tax-2,Mum v. Bank Of Baroda
Date of order
09 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/2038/2010 Of The Commissiner Of Income-Tax-2,Mum v. Bank Of Baroda, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Bhosale for Appellant.None for Respondent P.C. :- 1)In view of dismissal of Notice of Motion,Appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1468 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Bank of Baroda... Respondent Mrs. P.P. Bhosale for Appellant.None for Respondent P.C. :- 1)In view of dismissal of Notice of Motion,Appeal also stands dismissed. ( DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) ( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan