Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/2054/2009 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/2054/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- V, Pune v. Mahindra Hinodaya Industries Ltd., Pune

High Court 09 Oct 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2054/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- V, Pune v. Mahindra Hinodaya Industries Ltd., Pune
Date of order
09 Oct 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/2054/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- V, Pune v. Mahindra Hinodaya Industries Ltd., Pune, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of the dismissal of the quantum appeal, this appeal is also liable to be dismissed for want of substantial question of law.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2054 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. Mahindra Hinodaya Industries Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. P.S. Sahadevan i/b. Vimal Gupta for appellant. Mr. Sanjiv Shah for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 9TH OCTOBER, 2009. P.C. :- Mr. P.S. Sahadevan, learned counsel for the revenue holding for Mr. Vimal Gupta and learned counsel for the respondent agree that the quantum appeal has already been dismissed by this Court in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1445 of 2008 vide order dated 23rd June, 2009 for want of substantial question of law as such present appeal dealing with question of cancelling the penalty u/s.271 (1)(c) of the I.T. Act may not hold water. In view of the dismissal of the quantum appeal, this appeal is also liable to be dismissed for want of substantial question of law. Order accordingly. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan