In Itxa/2080/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -10 Mumbai v. M/S. Lsr Speciality Oils Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: TATED, JJ.DATED : 14TH SEPTEMBER, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in holding that the activity of processing the oil carried on by the assessee amounts to manufacturing or production of goods or articles eligible for deduction under Section 801 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the questi...
Decision: In this view of the matter, both the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2080 OF 2009ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2084 OF2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-10, Mumbai
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. LSR Speciality Oils Pvt. Ltd.
..Respondent.
Ms. Suchitra Kamble for the appellant.
Mr. K. Gopal with Jitendra Singh for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND K.K. TATED, JJ.DATED : 14TH SEPTEMBER, 2011
P.C. :-
1.Whether the ITAT was justified in holding that the activity of processing the oil carried on by the assessee amounts to manufacturing or production of goods or articles eligible for deduction under Section 801 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in these appeals.
2.The ITAT has allowed the claim of the assessee by following its decision in the assessee's own case for AY 1996-97 to 1999-2000 and also for AY 2001-02. Counsel for the revenue states that the
appeals filed by the revenue against those assessment years have been dismissed for non removal of office objections. Thus, the orders passed by the ITAT for those assessment years have attained finality. No case is made out to find fault with the reasoning given by the ITAT for those assessment years. In this view of the matter, both the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.
(K.K. TATED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.