Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/208/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/208/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. Chikki Fertilizer Trading And Agencis P. Ld

High Court 31 Jul 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/208/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. Chikki Fertilizer Trading And Agencis P. Ld
Date of order
31 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/208/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. Chikki Fertilizer Trading And Agencis P. Ld, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.208 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-tax-3 ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Chikki Fertilizers Trading and Agencies Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. Mr.J.D. Mistry with Mr.Raj Darak & Mr.P.C. Tripathi for the Respondent. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 31ST JULY, 2008 P.C. : 1. The issue raised in this appeal relates to the computation of profit under Section 115JA in respect of "loss on revaluation of investment". The tribunal has allowed the claim of the assessee by relying upon several decisions of the tribunal. Moreover, the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Apollo Tyres V/s. C.I.T. reported in 255 ITR 273 is also in favour of the assessee. 2. In this view of the matter, we see no merit in the appeal. Hence, dismissed. D.K. DESHMUKH, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan