Itxa/2082/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -24 Mumbai v. Knr Patel Jv
High Court
25 Feb 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2082/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -24 Mumbai v. Knr Patel Jv
Date of order
25 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/2082/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -24 Mumbai v. Knr Patel Jv, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2082 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. KNR Patel (JV)
..Respondent.
Ms. Suchitra Kamble for appellant.
Mr. Percy J. Pardiwalla, senior Advocate with Madhur Agarwal and Rajesh Poojari i/b.Mint & Confrers for respondent.
CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 25TH FEBRUARY, 2010
P.C. :-
1.Admit.
2.The order passed by the Tribunal in the present case is common for assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05. For the reasons already indicated while setting aside the order of the Tribunal in the case of the same assessee for assessment year 2003-04 (Income Tax Appeal No.2197 of 2009) and remanding the proceedings back to the Tribunal, we dispose of this appeal inn the same terms. There shall be no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue