In Itxa/2095/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -8, Mumbai v. M/S Hotel Leela Venture Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2095 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Hotel Leela Venture Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant.
Ms. Beena Pillai for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 7TH DECEMBER, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the revenue and learned counsel appearing for the respondents. Learned counsel for the revenue fairly stated that the Tribunal has relied upon its own judgment in the case of the assessee itself and the appeal carried by the revenue is dismissed by this Court and the revenue has accepted the same. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in the appeal. The appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue