Itxa/2100/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-16, Mumbai v. M/S. Lunar Gems
High Court
29 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2100/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-16, Mumbai v. M/S. Lunar Gems
Date of order
29 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/2100/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-16, Mumbai v. M/S. Lunar Gems, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1453 of 2006
Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant
Vs,.
M/s.Lunar Gens ..Respondent
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant
Mr.Paras S. Savla with Mr. Ajay R. Singh
for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 29TH JANUARY 2008
CORAM: F.I.
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 29TH JANUARY 2008
P.C.:
P.C.:
. As the Motion is dismissed, even otherwise
the matter is restored to A.O. and as the tax
incidence is less than Rs.4.00 lakhs Appeal
dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.