In Itxa/2103/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11 ,Mumbai v. Dr. Mrs Nina A. Pai Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2103 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax.
... Appellant.
V/s.
Dr.(Mrs.) Nina A. Pai.
... Respondent.
Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
Manjukla Rao for the respondent.
P.C. :
CORAM :V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 15[th] October 2009.
appeal.
Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused
2.The issue sought to be raised in this appeal relates to deletion of addition of Rs.30 lakh on the ground that the assessee had established the genuineness of the gift and credit worthiness of the donor. The Tribunal has recorded finding of fact based on appreciation of evidence on record. In this view of the matter, we see no substantial question of law involved in this appeal. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue