Case Law › High Court › Itxa/212/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/212/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City,Mumbai v. M/S Esab (I) Ltd.mumbai

High Court 10 Jan 2005 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

10 Jan 2005

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/212/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City,Mumbai v. M/S Esab (I) Ltd.mumbai, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 15 and 16 of the said order, we do not find any substantial question of law involved in the above Appeal, the same stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Income Tax Appeal No. 212 of 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant V/s. M/s. Esab (India) Ltd. .. Respondent Mr. R. Ashokan for the Appellant None present for the Respondent CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 10.01.2005 DATED : 10.01.2005 DATED : 10.01.2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant. Perused the order dated 26.5.2003 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Specially for the reasons stated in paragraph nos. 15 and 16 of the said order, we do not find any substantial question of law involved in the above Appeal, the same stands dismissed. (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.