Itxa/2123/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 Mumbai v. Cabot India Ltd Mumbai
High Court
16 Oct 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2123/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 Mumbai v. Cabot India Ltd Mumbai
Date of order
16 Oct 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/2123/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 Mumbai v. Cabot India Ltd Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2123 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Cabot India Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan i/b. Suresh Kumar for appellant.
Mr. A.K. Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the parties. Both the parties agree that so far as the first question raised in the appaal is concerned, the same is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. M/s. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd. in Income Tax Appeal No.8 of 2009 decided on 24th March, 2009. Whereas, the second question is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. M/s. WMI Cranes in Income Tax Appeal No.1155 of 2007 decided on 9th October, 2007. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in the appeal. The appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue