Itxa/2128/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 24 Mumbai v. Central Medical And General Stores
High Court
30 Nov 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2128/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 24 Mumbai v. Central Medical And General Stores
Date of order
30 Nov 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/2128/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 24 Mumbai v. Central Medical And General Stores, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: All the appeals are, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2104 OF 2009ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2199 OF 2009ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2128 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Central Medical & General Stores..Respondent.
Ms. Suchitra Kamble for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 30TH NOVEMBER, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the revenue. So far as the first question is concerned, it is nothing finding of fact based on appreciation of evidence. So far as the second question is concerned, the Tribunal has followed the orders of the previous years. The view taken by the Tribunal is a reasonable and possible view and no fault can be found with the same. No substantial question of law arise in the above appeals. All the appeals are, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.