Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/213/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/213/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7, Mumbai v. M/S. Shell Inn International Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

High Court 03 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/213/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7, Mumbai v. M/S. Shell Inn International Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai
Date of order
03 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/213/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7, Mumbai v. M/S. Shell Inn International Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.Appeal is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 3663 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-tax-, ... Appellant. V/s. M/s.Shell Inn International Pvt.Ltd.... Respondent. Suresh Kumar for the appellant. P.C. : CORAM :V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 3[rd] August 2009. Heard. Office objections are over-ruled. Appeal is taken up for hearing at the request of the appellant. 2.The question sought to be raised in this appeal relates to deletion of penalty under section 271(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal after having perused the record before it recorded finding of fact that there was no concealment on the part of the assessee, consequently, penalty should not have been inflicted merely because income was claimed under wrong head. No fault can be found with the view taken by the Tribunal. The appeal is without any substance. 3.Appeal is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan