Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/2132/2009 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/2132/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 8, Mumbai v. Kec Infrastructures Ltd.( Formerly Known As Kec International Ltd. )

High Court 30 Nov 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2132/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 8, Mumbai v. Kec Infrastructures Ltd.( Formerly Known As Kec International Ltd. )
Date of order
30 Nov 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/2132/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 8, Mumbai v. Kec Infrastructures Ltd.( Formerly Known As Kec International Ltd. ), the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2132 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. KEC Infrastructures Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant. None for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 30TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C. :- Heard learned counsel for the revenue. He fairly states that so far as the first question is concerned, it is answered against the revenue in the case of CIT v/s. Associated Cables P. Ltd. reported in (2006 286 ITR 596 (Bom) and the remaining two questions are covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of the same assessee in Income Tax Appeal No.707 of 2008 decided on 13th April, 2009. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in this appeal. The appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan