Itxa/214/2004 Of Koparagaon Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nasjik And Anr
High Court
14 Feb 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/214/2004 Of Koparagaon Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nasjik And Anr
Date of order
14 Feb 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/214/2004 Of Koparagaon Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nasjik And Anr, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence both the appeals are allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.214 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.214 OF 2004
AND
AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.215 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.215 OF 2004
Koparagaon Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ..Appellant.
V/s.
Dy.Commissioner of Income-tax & Anr. ..Respondents.
Mr.R.R.Bhosale i/b. B.V.Mahadik for appellant.
Mr.R.V.Desai,senior counsel with R.Asokan for respondents.
CORAM : S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
CORAM : S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 14TH FEBRUARY, 2005.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 14TH FEBRUARY, 2005.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and
the respondent. Both learned counsel categorically state
that the issues involved in the above appeals are squarely
covered by the Judgment of Supreme Court in the case of
Siddheshwar Sahakari Karkhana Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of
Siddheshwar Sahakari Karkhana Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of
Income-Tax & Ors.
Income-Tax & Ors. reported in 270 I.T.R.1 against the
revenue and in favour of the assessee. Hence both the
appeals are allowed.
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue