Itxa/2145/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Ltu) v. Tata Motors Ltd

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 697 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax v/s. M/s. Shell Hotels & Resorts Pvt. Ltd. .. Appellant .. Respondent ALONG WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS. 360/2008, 361/2008, 378/2008,985/2008, 1502/2009, 2411/2009, 4735/2010, 6186/2010,6660/2010, 1949/2011, 2207/2013, 604/2014, 373/2015,883/2015, 371/2016, 721/2016, 1725/2017, 738/2018,1177/2018, 1566/2018, 1770/2018, 2145/2018, 2177/2018,2228/2018, 2432/2018, 2476/2018, 3053/2018, 27/2019,43/2019, 663/2019, 766/2019, 793/2019, 806/2019, 990/2019, 1122/2019, 1262/2019, 1371/2019, 1550/2019, 1552/2019,1743/2019, 1788/2019, 1841/2019, 1894/2019, 1953/2019,1956/2019, 1957/2019, 1964/2019, 2088/2019, 2098/2019, 2099/2019, 2103/2019, 2121/2019, 2350/2019 AND ITXA(L) No. 177/2019 Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for the appellant in ITXA Nos. 990/19,1841/19, 1894/19, 1964/19, 2088/19, 2098/19, 2099/19 and2103/19 Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant in rest of the appeals Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the respondent/s in ITXA Nos. 697/04, 6186/10,1949/11, 1177/18, 1566/18, 27/19, 1841/19, 1894/19, 1957/19,1964/19, 2088/19, 2098/19, 2099/19, 2103/19 and ITXA (L) No.177/19 Mr. Subhash S. Shetty for the respondent/s in ITXA Nos. 360/08,361/08, 378/08, 985/08, 2207/13 and 43/19 Mr. Sanjiv M. Shah for the respondent/s in ITXA No.1502/09 and721/16 Mr. Jai Chhobria for the respondent in ITXA No. 2411/09 Mr. Ashok J. Patil for the respondent in ITXA No.4735/10 Mr. Jas Sanghavi for the respondent in ITXA No.604/14 Mr. Upendra Lokegaonkar i/b Mint & Conferes for the respondent inITXA Nos. 373/15 and 2177/18 Mr. B.V. Jhaveri for the respondent in ITXA Nos. 738/18 and 663/19 Ms. Ankita Vashishta i/b UBR Legal Advocates for the respondent/s inITXA Nos. 793/19 and 806/19 Ms. Aasifa Khan for the respondent in ITXA No. 990/19 CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & NITIN JAMDAR, J.J. DATED : 7[th] NOVEMBER, 2019 P.C. 1.Learned learned Counsel appearing in support of theseappeals, on instructions, seeks to withdraw these appeals. This forthe reason that the tax effect involved in this appeal is less than thethreshold limit prescribed in CBDT Circular No.3/2018 dated 11[th]July, 2018 and revised Circular No.17/2019, dated 8[th] August, 2019. 2.Refund of Court fees as per rules. In the above view, these appeals are disposed of as withdrawn. (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)