Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/215/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/215/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -21, Mumbai v. Sri. Sanjeeeva Narna Shetty

High Court 24 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/215/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -21, Mumbai v. Sri. Sanjeeeva Narna Shetty
Date of order
24 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/215/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -21, Mumbai v. Sri. Sanjeeeva Narna Shetty, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: Appeal is, therefore, disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.215 OF 2008 ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s appearances, Court’s orders order or directions ----------------------------------------------------- ¦ Mr.Abhay Ahuja for the Appellant. ¦ Mr.S.S.Shetty for the Respondent. ¦ ¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & ¦ J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. ¦ DATED:24TH JULY, 2008 P.C.: Heard the learned Counsel for both sides. We find no substantial question of law arises, because the tribunal has correctly observed that the assessee had given details and even the names of the persons from whom loan was taken. If according to the Department, this information is incorrect, then they could have summoned the persons whose names have been disclosed. Appeal is, therefore, disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan