Itxa/2176/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 20 Mumbai v. M/S. E-Jewellery
High Court
05 Mar 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2176/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 20 Mumbai v. M/S. E-Jewellery
Date of order
05 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
2002-03
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/2176/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 20 Mumbai v. M/S. E-Jewellery, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2176 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-20..Appellant.V/s.M/s. E-Jewellery..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Appellant.Mr. A. K. Jasani, for the Respondent.
P.C:-
CORAM: J.P.DEVADHAR & M.S.SANKLECHA,JJ.DATE : 5[th] MARCH, 2013.
Heard.
2In this Appeal by the Revenue for the Assessment Year 2002-03 following question has been raised for our consideration.
Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is right in restoring the issue under Section 10A to the file of Assessing Officer for fresh examination without deciding the issue whether the assessee is entitled to deduction under Section 10A as claimed by the assessee?
3Since the Tribunal has restored the issue of claim under Section 10A to the file of Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, we see
no reason to entertain the proposed question of law.
4Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.