Itxa/2190/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -11 Mumbai v. Little And Company
High Court
01 Aug 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2190/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -11 Mumbai v. Little And Company
Date of order
01 Aug 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/2190/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -11 Mumbai v. Little And Company, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2190 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-11, Mumbai
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Little & Co.
..Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
Mr. F.B. Andhyarujina, senior Advocate with Ms. Parital Mehta i/b. Little & Co. for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATED : 1ST AUGUST, 2011
P.C. :-
Counsel for the parties state that similar question raised in
this appeal was raised in Income Tax Appeal No.4920 of 2010 in the assessee's own case and the said appeal has been dismissed by us today i.e. 1st August, 2011. For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue