Case Law › High Court › Itxa/2211/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/2211/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-1,Mum v. M/S Swamini Leasing And Inv.pvt Ltd

High Court 11 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

11 Apr 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/2211/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-1,Mum v. M/S Swamini Leasing And Inv.pvt Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: P.C. :- P.C. :- In view of the dismissal of Notice of Motion, the appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1851 OF 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1851 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Swamini Leasing & Investment P.Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.A.S.Rao for appellant. Mr.P.C.Tripathi i/b.Pramod Kumar Parida for respondent. CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 11TH APRIL, 2008. CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 11TH APRIL, 2008. P.C. :- P.C. :- In view of the dismissal of Notice of Motion, the appeal also stands dismissed. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.