Itxa/2214/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-9, Mumbai v. Farry Industries Ltd, Pune
High Court
15 Dec 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2214/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-9, Mumbai v. Farry Industries Ltd, Pune
Date of order
15 Dec 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/2214/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-9, Mumbai v. Farry Industries Ltd, Pune, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The view taken by the Tribunal, more particularly in paragraph- 7 of the said order, cannot be faulted.The appeal is, therefore, liable to be dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
acd
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2214 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax- 9
...Appellant.
V/s.Farry Industries Ltd.... Respondent.
----
Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Appellant.Ms. A. Khan with S.R. Mody, for the Respondent.
----
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
P.C.:
DATED : 15TH DECEMBER, 2009
1.Heard learned counsel for the Revenue and learned counsel for the
respondent.
2.This appeal is directed against the order dated 2.7.2008 passed by
the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The view taken by the Tribunal, more particularly in paragraph- 7 of the said order, cannot be faulted.The appeal is, therefore, liable to be dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs. Order accordingly.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue