Itxa/22/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-Iii v. Jaisingh Wire Ltd
High Court
16 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/22/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-Iii v. Jaisingh Wire Ltd
Date of order
16 Sep 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/22/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-Iii v. Jaisingh Wire Ltd, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: We accept the statment of the learned counsel and allow the appeal to be withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.22 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Central III, Mumbai .. Appellant.
V/s.
Mr.Jaisingh Wires Pvt. ltd. .. Respondent.
Mr.R.Asokan i/b. K.B. Rao for the appellant.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA, &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 16TH SEPTEMBER, 2004.
P.C. :
. The learned counsel for the revenue
submits that he has instructions to withdraw the
appeal in view of the authoratative pronouncement of
the Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of
Income Tax V/s. Indo Nippon Chemicals Co. Ltd.
[261 ITR 275].
2. We accept the statment of the learned
counsel and allow the appeal to be withdrawn.
3. Refund of court fee as per law.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
2
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue