Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/22/2007 Of Commissioner Of Income-T...

Itxa/22/2007 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-(Tds) v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd

High Court 23 Sep 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/22/2007 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-(Tds) v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd
Date of order
23 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/22/2007 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-(Tds) v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In this view of the matter,we dismiss the appeal with liberty toapproach this Court by way of anappeal, if the approval by the CabinetCommittee of Disputes is given.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL No. 22 OF 2007 _____________________________________________________Office Notes, Office :Memorandum of Coram, :Appearance, Court’s:Court’s ordersorders of directions :or Judge’sand Prothonotary’s orderorders ----------------------------------------------------- Mr. Pankaj Kapoor, for the Appellant. Mr. J.D. Mistry with Atul Jasani, forthe Respondent. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI, &A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.DATE : SEPTEMBER 23, 2008. PC :- 1.It is submitted that this appeal could not have been filedwithout the approval of the CabinetCommittee of Disputes. It is notknown to the counsel for the appellantwhether the Committee was approachedor not. In this view of the matter,we dismiss the appeal with liberty toapproach this Court by way of anappeal, if the approval by the CabinetCommittee of Disputes is given.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan