In Itxa/22/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central-Iii,Mum v. M/S.shree Krishna Silk Ind.pvt.ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, the appeal stands dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.22 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax..AppellantVs.M/s.Shree Krishna Silk Ind.Pvt.Ltd...RespondentMr.Suresh Kumar for appellantMr.P.J.Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate withMr.S.G.Lalkhani for respondent.CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATE : 6TH APRIL, 2009P.C..Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.The questions of law framed in this appeal revolvearound appreciation of evidence and findings of fact.No perversity in the impugned order could bedemonstrated by the appellant giving rise to thesubstantial question of law. Hence, the appeal stands
dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue