Itxa/222/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-Xvi v. Naval F. Pandole
High Court
13 Aug 2004 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/222/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-Xvi v. Naval F. Pandole
Date of order
13 Aug 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/222/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-Xvi v. Naval F. Pandole, the High Court (2004) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 222 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income Tax,City-XVI, Mumbai.. Appellantv/s.Mr. Naval F. Pandole.. RespondentCORAM : R.M.LODHA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED:13thAugust, 2004P.C.None appears for the appellant.2. Though Mr. Pankaj Kapur, Central Governmentadvocate is sitting in the court, neither he noranyone appears for the appellant.3. Dismissed in default.4. The appellant is directed to recover the amountof court fee paid on the appeal from theofficer/official due to whose inaction andnegligence the appeal went unrepresented and cameto be dismissed in default.5. Let the copy of this order be sent to theCommissioner of Income Tax, City-XVI, Matru Mandir,Tardeo Road, Mumbai-7.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue