Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/2239/2013 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/2239/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. Gkn Sinter Metals Pvt. Ltd

High Court 23 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2239/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. Gkn Sinter Metals Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
23 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/2239/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. Gkn Sinter Metals Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 4.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2239 OF 2013 The Commissioner of Income Tax-V, Pune .. Appellant v/s. GKN Sinter Metals Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent Mr. Tejveer Singh for the appellant Mr. Jitendra Jain a/w Mr. Atul Jasani for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.J. DATED : 23[rd] FEBRUARY, 2016. P.C. 1.This Appeal relates to Assessment Year 2003-04. 2.Mr. Tejveer Singh, learned Counsel for the Revenue files an affidavit dated 19[th] February, 2016 of one Mr. P.N. Nair, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax. In the affidavit, it has been stated that inadvertently in the memo of appeal the tax effect was indicated at Rs.32.17 lakhs when it is only Rs.16.66 lakhs. The affidavit is taken on record. 3.Mr. Tejveer Singh, learned Counsel for the Revenue states that the tax effect involved in the present appeal is less than Rs.20 lakhs. He further states that in view of the Central Board of Direct Tax Circular No.21/15, dated 10[th] December, 2015, the tax effect being less than the threshold limits of Rs.20 lakhs provided therein to challenge an order of the Tribunal before this Court and the direction therein to withdraw or not to press the pending appeals having a tax effect of less than Rs. 20 lakhs, he is instructed not to press the present appeal. 4.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Refund of Court fees as per Rules. (B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan