Itxa/224/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Central-I,Mum v. Afl Pvt Ltd
High Court
15 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/224/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Central-I,Mum v. Afl Pvt Ltd
Date of order
15 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/224/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Central-I,Mum v. Afl Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.224 OF 2009
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.224 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
AFL Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent.
None for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 15TH APRIL, 2009.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 15TH APRIL, 2009.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
None present for the appellant. Even on
the last date of hearing i.e. on 4/4/2009 nobody was
present on behalf of the appellant. In this view of
the matter, appeal is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue