Itxa/2259/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 8 Mumbai v. M/S. Zeus Air Services Pvt Ltd
High Court
22 Feb 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2259/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 8 Mumbai v. M/S. Zeus Air Services Pvt Ltd
Date of order
22 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/2259/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 8 Mumbai v. M/S. Zeus Air Services Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2259 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax V/s.M/s. Zeus Air Services Pvt. Ltd.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant.
Mr. R. Murlidhar with B.G. Yewale i/b. Rajesh & Co. for respondent.
CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
P.C. :-
DATED : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2010
1.The appeal was admitted on 11[th] January, 2010 on the following substantial question of law:-
“ Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that as the assessing officer failed to issue a notice u/s.143(2) within the period of 12 months from the end of the month in which the assessee filed the return for the block period, there is fetter on the power of the AO to make the assessment and hence the assessment made by AO is null and void ? “
2.Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue states
that the issue is covered against the Revenue by the judgment of the Supreme Court in Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. V/s. M/s.
Hotel Blue Moon [Civil Appeal No.1198/10] decided on 2[nd] February, 2010 and the substantial question of law stands answered against the Revenue in terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court. The appeal is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.