Itxa/2268/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income -Tax-1, Mumbai v. M/S. Burson Marsteller Roger Pereira Communications (P) Ltd., Mumbai
High Court
14 Sep 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2268/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income -Tax-1, Mumbai v. M/S. Burson Marsteller Roger Pereira Communications (P) Ltd., Mumbai
Date of order
14 Sep 2011
Assessment year(s)
1994-95
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/2268/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income -Tax-1, Mumbai v. M/S. Burson Marsteller Roger Pereira Communications (P) Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 2.Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the income arising from activities termed as 'perception management' activity, entitles the assessee for deduction under Section 80O of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is the question raised by the revenue in this appeal.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2268 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Mumbai
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Burson Marsteller Roger Pereira Communications (P) Ltd. (now changed toR & P Management Communcations P. Ltd.)
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
Mr. F.V. Irani with A.K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND K.K. TATED, JJ.DATED : 14TH SEPTEMBER, 2011
P.C. :-
1.This appeal is filed by the revenue against the order of the ITAT dated 14th October, 2008 in ITA No.3321/Mum/2003 relating to assessment year 1994-95.
2.Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the income
arising from activities termed as 'perception management' activity, entitles the assessee for deduction under Section 80O of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is the question raised by the revenue in this appeal.
3.Perusal of the order of ITAT, particularly para 21 thereof shows that the ITAT has restored the issue back to the file of the assessing officer to ascertain the quantum received by the assessee from foreign enterprises on account of perception management services rendered from India and not on account of perception management services rendered in India. Since the ITAT has restored the issue back to the file of the assessing officer for fresh decision with the above direction, we see no reason to entertain this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(K.K. TATED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.