Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/2275/2009 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/2275/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-21, Mumbai v. The Jai Hind Co Operative Hsg. Soc Ltd., Mumbai

High Court 14 Nov 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2275/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-21, Mumbai v. The Jai Hind Co Operative Hsg. Soc Ltd., Mumbai
Date of order
14 Nov 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/2275/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-21, Mumbai v. The Jai Hind Co Operative Hsg. Soc Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Decision: 3.The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2275 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax-21, Mumbai ..Appellant. V/s. The Jaihind Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant. Mr. F.V. Irani with Atul K. Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 14TH NOVEMBER, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Counsel for the parties state that in view of the order passed today i.e. 14[th] November, 2011 in Income Tax Appeal No.2274 of 2009 in the case of the same assessee, the order of the ITAT may be quashed and set aside and the matter be restored to the file of ITAT for fresh consideration. 2.Accordingly, for the reasons stated in Income Tax Appeal No.2274 of 2009, the impugned order in this appeal is quashed and set aside and the matter is restored to the file of ITAT for fresh consideration in accordance with law. 3.The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. (A.R. JOSHI, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan